Flock ALPR cameras

Opposed the Flock cameras, citing a reported 71% misread rate on felony alerts and data sharing with out-of-state agencies, and urged removal of the systems.

Cited Flock's patent capabilities to track people, past breaches, and the expired Auburn data-sharing agreement, asking the council to end the contract.

A District 4 small business owner who argued the misread rate creates litigation liability, erodes trust in law enforcement, and cited out-of-state data-sharing violations.

Detailed national examples of wrongful detentions and stalking abuses from ALPR systems and noted California cities that have canceled Flock contracts.

Reframed the 71% misread figure as a 29% success rate and urged the council to verify the figure and terminate the Flock contract.

Called the Flock program a failed experiment that has cost millions and residents' privacy, urging full contract revocation.