Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Flock license plate reader cameras debate→At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 21, 2026.
Public comments (14)
Argued the Flock cameras constitute warrantless mass surveillance of every driver, cited a 71% misread rate, and asked the council to end the program or at least order an independent audit before renewal.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 36:11 →A Sun City Roseville resident thanked the council for funding police and supporting the Flock license plate reader cameras, calling them essential crime-deterrent tools.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 34:02 →Spoke in support of Flock cameras, citing a 2025 survey of 700 law enforcement agencies and noting that multi-step verification meant no misreads led to stops or arrests in Roseville.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 42:44 →Opposed the license plate reader technology, questioned the city's claim that most feedback supports it, and criticized dismissing public debate because the issue was discussed in 2018.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 45:24 →Repeated her request for a town hall and an agenda item on the Flock program, and relayed a question asking what distinguishes Roseville from cities that have cancelled Flock.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 47:52 →Speaking for the Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce's 1,300 member businesses, supported responsible use of license plate reader technology and urged regular public updates on the program.
City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 52:58 →Argued Flock cameras constitute unconstitutional mass surveillance without consent or warrants, and urged the city to remove them.
City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 35:01 →Traced the Flock contract history from 2020, said she found no evidence of the SB 34-required public meeting before implementation, and announced a public records request.
City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 40:40 →Argued the cameras violate privacy even if accurate, criticized Flock's funding origins, and urged the city to end the contract like Grass Valley did.
City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 47:04 →Cited a 71% failure rate and privacy violations, and requested a town hall meeting with the council and police chief to discuss the Flock system.
City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 38:00 →Cited a report that over 70% of Flock alerts to Roseville PD were false positives and urged the council to cancel the contract, noting more than 50 cities have done so.
City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 40:04 →Said council members deserve a pay raise under Measure A but urged them to rethink Flock surveillance, the data center, and ICE's presence, which he said is hurting local businesses.
City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 32:24 →Said Flock's changed terms grant it exclusive rights to collected data and urged the council to cancel the contract over privacy and accuracy concerns.
City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 42:02 →A West Roseville engineer who cautioned against the proposed Philip Road data center's proximity to homes and also urged suspending the Flock contract.
City Council - Aug 5, 2026 · 29:17 →