O
Roseville
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock cameras

Roseville

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (8)

At a glance

Public comments
11
Last 30 days
6

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 21, 2026.

Public comments (14)

OpposedBrendaOct 21, 2026

Argued the Flock cameras constitute warrantless mass surveillance of every driver, cited a 71% misread rate, and asked the council to end the program or at least order an independent audit before renewal.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 36:11 →
SupportiveDavid FreningerOct 21, 2026

A Sun City Roseville resident thanked the council for funding police and supporting the Flock license plate reader cameras, calling them essential crime-deterrent tools.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 34:02 →
SupportiveJim KiddOct 21, 2026

Spoke in support of Flock cameras, citing a 2025 survey of 700 law enforcement agencies and noting that multi-step verification meant no misreads led to stops or arrests in Roseville.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 42:44 →
OpposedCharles BorsosOct 21, 2026

Opposed the license plate reader technology, questioned the city's claim that most feedback supports it, and criticized dismissing public debate because the issue was discussed in 2018.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 45:24 →
OpposedKimOct 21, 2026

Repeated her request for a town hall and an agenda item on the Flock program, and relayed a question asking what distinguishes Roseville from cities that have cancelled Flock.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 47:52 →
SupportiveAnanda RochitaOct 21, 2026

Speaking for the Roseville Area Chamber of Commerce's 1,300 member businesses, supported responsible use of license plate reader technology and urged regular public updates on the program.

City Council - Oct 21, 2026 · 52:58 →
OpposedDerickSep 2, 2026

Argued Flock cameras constitute unconstitutional mass surveillance without consent or warrants, and urged the city to remove them.

City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 35:01 →
OpposedRosieSep 2, 2026

Traced the Flock contract history from 2020, said she found no evidence of the SB 34-required public meeting before implementation, and announced a public records request.

City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 40:40 →
OpposedJohn VandervortSep 2, 2026

Argued the cameras violate privacy even if accurate, criticized Flock's funding origins, and urged the city to end the contract like Grass Valley did.

City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 47:04 →
OpposedKim BraySep 2, 2026

Cited a 71% failure rate and privacy violations, and requested a town hall meeting with the council and police chief to discuss the Flock system.

City Council - Sep 2, 2026 · 38:00 →
OpposedClayton StraunAug 19, 2026

Cited a report that over 70% of Flock alerts to Roseville PD were false positives and urged the council to cancel the contract, noting more than 50 cities have done so.

City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 40:04 →
OpposedKen DellAug 19, 2026

Said council members deserve a pay raise under Measure A but urged them to rethink Flock surveillance, the data center, and ICE's presence, which he said is hurting local businesses.

City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 32:24 →
OpposedKim BrayAug 19, 2026

Said Flock's changed terms grant it exclusive rights to collected data and urged the council to cancel the contract over privacy and accuracy concerns.

City Council - Aug 19, 2026 · 42:02 →
ConcernedVanessa O'ConnorAug 5, 2026

A West Roseville engineer who cautioned against the proposed Philip Road data center's proximity to homes and also urged suspending the Flock contract.

City Council - Aug 5, 2026 · 29:17 →