O
Roseville
← Community
Public SafetyCommunity discussion

Flock license-plate recognition cameras

Roseville

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
5

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 4, 2026.

Public comments (5)

OpposedBrenda ShawNov 4, 2026

Argued the city's own records show 71% of alerts were misreads and that the city never counted public feedback before claiming support; asked the council to end the program or at least hold an independent audit and public discussion before renewal.

City Council - Nov 4, 2026 · 28:43 →
SupportiveCherry SpriggsNov 4, 2026

Executive director of the Placer Business Alliance, expressed support for the ALPR technology, noting her organization's major employers use it and crediting it for the region's safety reputation.

City Council - Nov 4, 2026 · 32:13 →
SupportiveEinar MaischNov 4, 2026

Cited police chief briefings and city data safeguards (60-day retention, no sale of data, audit compliance) and argued only criminals should fear the cameras.

City Council - Nov 4, 2026 · 34:00 →
SupportiveSusan RohanNov 4, 2026

Called herself part of the silent majority and urged the council to keep the cameras, adding a light-hearted 'I approve this message' sign-off.

City Council - Nov 4, 2026 · 37:04 →
SupportiveRobert DuganNov 4, 2026

A longtime Roseville resident who argued abandoning effective law-enforcement tools would be 'silly,' noting privacy concerns exist everywhere and the city has been forthright about misread statistics.

City Council - Nov 4, 2026 · 37:49 →