O
Roseville
← Community
EnvironmentCommunity discussion

Phillip Road Site Draft EIR

Roseville

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 12, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedJosh HicksonMar 12, 2026

Argued the DEIR is legally defective because it analyzes a low-intensity village while the infrastructure — a 49 MVA substation, 45 MW of diesel generators, and a six-lane freight route — is built for a data center and logistics hub. Urged the commission to pause, correct the project description, and recirculate the EIR.

Planning Commission - Mar 12, 2026 · 12:20 →
ConcernedKevin CarmichaelMar 12, 2026

An attorney for Placer County Residents for Responsible Development said the group is still reviewing the EIR, noted similar failures in a prior industrial version's EIR, and requested an extension of the comment period because air modeling documents haven't been made public.

Planning Commission - Mar 12, 2026 · 17:27 →
ConcernedAnne NewmanMar 12, 2026

Speaking for the Sun City Roseville community, she said residents still lack enough information for an accurate assessment and are concerned about potential biohazards, data centers, and effects on utility rates.

Planning Commission - Mar 12, 2026 · 21:26 →